0.05/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.05/0.14	% Command    : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC
0.13/0.34	% Computer   : n021.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 15:52:41 EDT 2021
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.13/0.34	% Number of cores: 8
0.13/0.34	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.13/0.34	# Version: 2.6rc1-ho
0.13/0.36	# No SInE strategy applied
0.13/0.36	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
0.19/0.52	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S061N
0.19/0.52	# and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAPPNTNp.
0.19/0.52	#
0.19/0.52	# Preprocessing time       : 0.108 s
0.19/0.52	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.19/0.52	
0.19/0.52	# Proof found!
0.19/0.52	# SZS status Theorem
0.19/0.52	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.19/0.52	thf(fact_20_usubstappf_Osimps_I2_J, axiom, ![X48:produc1418842292n_game, X49:set_variable, X13:trm, X14:trm]:(uSubst516392804stappf @ X48 @ X49 @ (geq @ X13 @ X14))=(uSubst152838031e_Geqo @ (uSubst516392818stappt @ X48 @ X49 @ X13) @ (uSubst516392818stappt @ X48 @ X49 @ X14)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_20_usubstappf_Osimps_I2_J)).
0.19/0.52	thf(conj_0, conjecture, (uSubst516392818stappt @ sigma @ ua @ theta)!=(none_trm), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)).
0.19/0.52	thf(fact_15_Geqo_Osimps_I2_J, axiom, ![X350:option_trm]:(uSubst152838031e_Geqo @ none_trm @ X350)=(none_fml), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_15_Geqo_Osimps_I2_J)).
0.19/0.52	thf(fact_2_Geq_Oprems_I1_J, axiom, (uSubst516392804stappf @ sigma @ ua @ (geq @ theta @ eta))!=(none_fml), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_2_Geq_Oprems_I1_J)).
0.19/0.52	thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X3087:produc1418842292n_game, X3088:set_variable, X3089:trm, X3090:trm]:(uSubst516392804stappf @ X3087 @ X3088 @ (geq @ X3089 @ X3090))=(uSubst152838031e_Geqo @ (uSubst516392818stappt @ X3087 @ X3088 @ X3089) @ (uSubst516392818stappt @ X3087 @ X3088 @ X3090)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_20_usubstappf_Osimps_I2_J])).
0.19/0.52	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (uSubst516392818stappt @ sigma @ ua @ theta)=(none_trm), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])).
0.19/0.52	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X2581:option_trm]:(uSubst152838031e_Geqo @ none_trm @ X2581)=(none_fml), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_15_Geqo_Osimps_I2_J])).
0.19/0.52	thf(c_0_7, plain, (uSubst516392804stappf @ sigma @ ua @ (geq @ theta @ eta))!=(none_fml), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_2_Geq_Oprems_I1_J])).
0.19/0.52	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X13:trm, X2:set_variable, X48:produc1418842292n_game, X14:trm]:(uSubst516392804stappf @ X48 @ X2 @ (geq @ X13 @ X14))=(uSubst152838031e_Geqo @ (uSubst516392818stappt @ X48 @ X2 @ X13) @ (uSubst516392818stappt @ X48 @ X2 @ X14)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.19/0.52	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (uSubst516392818stappt @ sigma @ ua @ theta)=(none_trm), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.19/0.52	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1:option_trm]:(uSubst152838031e_Geqo @ none_trm @ X1)=(none_fml), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.19/0.52	thf(c_0_11, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), c_0_9]), c_0_10])]), ['proof']).
0.19/0.52	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.19/0.52	# Proof object total steps             : 12
0.19/0.52	# Proof object clause steps            : 5
0.19/0.52	# Proof object formula steps           : 7
0.19/0.52	# Proof object conjectures             : 3
0.19/0.52	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
0.19/0.52	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
0.19/0.52	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
0.19/0.52	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
0.19/0.52	# Proof object generating inferences   : 0
0.19/0.52	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
0.19/0.52	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
0.19/0.52	# Parsed axioms                        : 549
0.19/0.52	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.19/0.52	# Initial clauses                      : 1346
0.19/0.52	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 353
0.19/0.52	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 993
0.19/0.52	# Processed clauses                    : 817
0.19/0.52	# ...of these trivial                  : 6
0.19/0.52	# ...subsumed                          : 77
0.19/0.52	# ...remaining for further processing  : 734
0.19/0.52	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 166
0.19/0.52	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.19/0.52	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.19/0.52	# Backward-rewritten                   : 4
0.19/0.52	# Generated clauses                    : 166
0.19/0.52	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 146
0.19/0.52	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.19/0.52	# Paramodulations                      : 0
0.19/0.52	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.19/0.52	# NegExts                              : 0
0.19/0.52	# Equation resolutions                 : 166
0.19/0.52	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.19/0.52	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.19/0.52	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.19/0.52	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.19/0.52	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.19/0.52	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.19/0.52	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.19/0.52	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.19/0.52	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.19/0.52	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.19/0.52	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.19/0.52	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.19/0.52	# Current number of processed clauses  : 564
0.19/0.52	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 54
0.19/0.52	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
0.19/0.52	#    Negative unit clauses             : 32
0.19/0.52	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 475
0.19/0.52	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 322
0.19/0.52	# ...number of literals in the above   : 1657
0.19/0.52	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.19/0.52	# Current number of archived clauses   : 4
0.19/0.52	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 82955
0.19/0.52	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 42641
0.19/0.52	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 64
0.19/0.52	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 531
0.19/0.52	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 2
0.19/0.52	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 16
0.19/0.52	# BW rewrite match successes           : 6
0.19/0.52	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.19/0.52	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.19/0.52	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 86214
0.19/0.53	
0.19/0.53	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.53	# User time                : 0.171 s
0.19/0.53	# System time              : 0.012 s
0.19/0.53	# Total time               : 0.184 s
0.19/0.53	# Maximum resident set size: 3024 pages
0.19/0.53	EOF
